Study suggests 60% of U.S. neurologists experiencing burnout
American Academy of Neurology News Feb 10, 2017
Six out of 10 neurologists in the United States are experiencing some form of burnout, according to a large study by the American Academy of Neurology. The study, believed to be the most in–depth look at burnout within a medical specialty, is published in the January 25, 2017, online issue of the journal Neurology.
ÂThese findings confirm our recognition of burnout as a serious issue facing our profession and why the well–being of neurologists – starting with decreasing regulatory hassles – must be addressed to ensure our patients receive the highest quality care, said Terrence L. Cascino, MD, FAAN, President of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology is the only medical specialty that has both one of the highest rates of burnout and the lowest rates of satisfaction with work–life balance, which may cause neurologists to lose enthusiasm for their work, force some to leave practice early, and lead to fewer medical students choosing to enter neurology as a career.
The study involved 1,671 neurologists with a median age of 51 years and an average 17 years in practice. Of the group who completed the questionnaire, 65 percent were men. Participants reported working an average of 56 hours per week, with three–fourths of that time spent in clinical care. One–third of neurologists worked in academic practice, or a university setting, and the rest in clinical practice. The study found 60 percent of neurologists reported at least one symptom of burnout (high emotional exhaustion or high depersonalization). A majority, 53 percent, of neurologists had high emotional exhaustion, 41 percent felt high depersonalization and 21 percent had a low personal accomplishment score. Clinical practice neurologists had a higher burnout rate than academic neurologists (63 percent versus 56 percent).
Hours worked per week, nights on call per week, number of outpatients seen each week, and amount of clerical work were associated with greater burnout risk. Lower risk was associated with effective support staff, job autonomy, meaningful work, age and subspecializing in epilepsy.
Other key findings of the study:
According to the study, effective approaches to address these issues and cultivate meaning and engagement in neurology practice could include efforts within the neurologistÂs work unit and organization to improve efficiency, optimize workload, decrease clerical burden, provide greater flexibility and control over work and enhance support staff. Physician–friendly national policies that decrease regulatory burden and mandated clerical tasks would also enhance neurologists engagement in the practice of neurology.
Go to Original
ÂThese findings confirm our recognition of burnout as a serious issue facing our profession and why the well–being of neurologists – starting with decreasing regulatory hassles – must be addressed to ensure our patients receive the highest quality care, said Terrence L. Cascino, MD, FAAN, President of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology is the only medical specialty that has both one of the highest rates of burnout and the lowest rates of satisfaction with work–life balance, which may cause neurologists to lose enthusiasm for their work, force some to leave practice early, and lead to fewer medical students choosing to enter neurology as a career.
The study involved 1,671 neurologists with a median age of 51 years and an average 17 years in practice. Of the group who completed the questionnaire, 65 percent were men. Participants reported working an average of 56 hours per week, with three–fourths of that time spent in clinical care. One–third of neurologists worked in academic practice, or a university setting, and the rest in clinical practice. The study found 60 percent of neurologists reported at least one symptom of burnout (high emotional exhaustion or high depersonalization). A majority, 53 percent, of neurologists had high emotional exhaustion, 41 percent felt high depersonalization and 21 percent had a low personal accomplishment score. Clinical practice neurologists had a higher burnout rate than academic neurologists (63 percent versus 56 percent).
Hours worked per week, nights on call per week, number of outpatients seen each week, and amount of clerical work were associated with greater burnout risk. Lower risk was associated with effective support staff, job autonomy, meaningful work, age and subspecializing in epilepsy.
Other key findings of the study:
- 61 percent of neurologists would choose to become a physician again while 67 percent would choose to become a neurologist again
- 67 percent of neurologists were satisfied with their job
- One in three neurologists indicated their work schedule left enough time for personal/family life
- 60 percent of neurologists reported they have significant autonomy in determining how they do their job
- Most neurologists (88 percent) reported their work is meaningful to them
- A minority of neurologists indicated the amount of time spent on clerical tasks was reasonable, both directly (23 percent) and indirectly (16 percent) related to patient care
- 56 percent of neurologists indicated that they had too little support staff to assist them in their work
According to the study, effective approaches to address these issues and cultivate meaning and engagement in neurology practice could include efforts within the neurologistÂs work unit and organization to improve efficiency, optimize workload, decrease clerical burden, provide greater flexibility and control over work and enhance support staff. Physician–friendly national policies that decrease regulatory burden and mandated clerical tasks would also enhance neurologists engagement in the practice of neurology.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries