• Profile
Close

PDR patients at high risk for being lost to follow-up, regardless of therapy choice

American Academy of Ophthalmology News May 25, 2018

This single-center retrospective study examined rates of loss to follow-up in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) who had received laser photocoagulation or intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

Study design

Researchers studied 2,302 patients with PDR who had received panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or anti-VEGF therapy. Loss to follow-up was defined as a gap of more than 12 months immediately following anti-VEGF or PRP.

Outcomes

Of 1,718 patients, 584 (25.4%) did not return for a follow-up visit during the 4-year study period. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the laser group were lost to follow-up compared with the anti-VEGF group (28% vs 22%; P<0.001)

Whites (19.4%) and Asians (19.7%) were lost to follow-up less often than African Americans (30.2%) or Hispanics/Native Americans/Pacific Islanders (38%). Other risk factors included younger age and residence in areas with lower average adjusted gross income.

Limitations

This study reported the experiences of only 1 large retina group located in the Northeast region of the United States. The authors did not consider the implications of early vs late PDR, and there was a wide spectrum of vision impairment in this group. Loss to follow-up was based on a 12-month gap in care; rates may have been higher with a shorter gap. The treating physicians chose the patients who received PRP vs anti-VEGF, and this potential selection bias may help explain the differences between these 2 groups.

Clinical significance

PDR patients are at risk for being lost to follow-up. This study demonstrates a fairly high real-world loss to follow-up rate, which is concerning. Key risk factors included age, race, and regional average gross income.

The DRCR.net’s Protocol S and UK CLARITY trials demonstrated that anti-VEGF monotherapy is noninferior or superior to PRP for treating patients with PDR. However, the gap in care may have been more impactful on patients treated with anti-VEGF, as PRP has lasting effects on regression of neovascularization. In clinical practice, choice of treatment for PDR must be carefully weighed, particularly if anti-VEGF monotherapy is initiated. Measures should be taken to decrease loss to follow-up after either therapy.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay