Monash plays key role in development of first international guidelines for public health surveillance ethics
Monash University News Jul 01, 2017
The World Health Organisation (WHO) has just released the first comprehensive international guidelines for public health surveillance ethics.
Development of these guidelines was a project of the Global Network of WHO Collaborating Centres for Bioethics, which is currently chaired by Monash University Professor Michael Selgelid who is also Director of the Monash Bioethics Centre.
The goal of the guideline development project was to help policymakers and practitioners navigate ethical issues around public health surveillance. While surveillance, when conducted ethically, is the foundation for programs to promote health and wellbeing, it can raise ethical issues around privacy, autonomy and equity.
Monash hosted one of the three main meetings that were part of the guideline development process at the Monash Prato Centre in Italy in 2015.
Release of these guidelines was announced in The Lancet Public Health journal.
Professor Selgelid explained how, in contrast to the long established guidelines and oversight mechanisms for research ethics, until now there have been no general guidelines or international standards for the ethical gathering and analysis of data for public health purposes. Though research and surveillance are closely related, their ethical requirements are commonly considered to be very different: "While informed consent is considered crucial in research ethics, when data is gathered for public health purposes – in order to identify outbreaks or monitor the spread of infectious diseases for example – informed consent is not usually sought or considered to be necessary," Professor Selgelid said.
ÂBecause public health data gathering is critical for prevention, detection and control of disease, it is ethically important that surveillance takes placeÂbut it is also important that sound guidelines are in place to protect individuals.Â
The WHO's document is comprised of 17 guidelines which outline the obligations of countries to collect, use, and share high quality data for legitimate public health purposes and the obligation of the global community to support countries lacking adequate resources to conduct surveillance activities. They also outline obligations and rights of individuals: while individuals should be expected to cooperate with surveillance activities, their private health information should be adequately secured, and individuals should be protected against stigmatisation or other possible harms from surveillance.
Dr Marie–Paule Kieny, Assistant Director–General of WHO, notes in the guidelines document that: "The goal of the guideline development project was to help policy–makers and practitioners navigate ethical issues presented by public health surveillance," and that ethically conducted surveillance: "can contribute to reducing inequalities; pockets of suffering that are unfair, unjust and preventable cannot be addressed if they are not first made visible.Â
Monash also contributed to development of WHO Guidance for Managing Ethical Issues in Infectious Disease Outbreaks, published in 2016.
Go to Original
Development of these guidelines was a project of the Global Network of WHO Collaborating Centres for Bioethics, which is currently chaired by Monash University Professor Michael Selgelid who is also Director of the Monash Bioethics Centre.
The goal of the guideline development project was to help policymakers and practitioners navigate ethical issues around public health surveillance. While surveillance, when conducted ethically, is the foundation for programs to promote health and wellbeing, it can raise ethical issues around privacy, autonomy and equity.
Monash hosted one of the three main meetings that were part of the guideline development process at the Monash Prato Centre in Italy in 2015.
Release of these guidelines was announced in The Lancet Public Health journal.
Professor Selgelid explained how, in contrast to the long established guidelines and oversight mechanisms for research ethics, until now there have been no general guidelines or international standards for the ethical gathering and analysis of data for public health purposes. Though research and surveillance are closely related, their ethical requirements are commonly considered to be very different: "While informed consent is considered crucial in research ethics, when data is gathered for public health purposes – in order to identify outbreaks or monitor the spread of infectious diseases for example – informed consent is not usually sought or considered to be necessary," Professor Selgelid said.
ÂBecause public health data gathering is critical for prevention, detection and control of disease, it is ethically important that surveillance takes placeÂbut it is also important that sound guidelines are in place to protect individuals.Â
The WHO's document is comprised of 17 guidelines which outline the obligations of countries to collect, use, and share high quality data for legitimate public health purposes and the obligation of the global community to support countries lacking adequate resources to conduct surveillance activities. They also outline obligations and rights of individuals: while individuals should be expected to cooperate with surveillance activities, their private health information should be adequately secured, and individuals should be protected against stigmatisation or other possible harms from surveillance.
Dr Marie–Paule Kieny, Assistant Director–General of WHO, notes in the guidelines document that: "The goal of the guideline development project was to help policy–makers and practitioners navigate ethical issues presented by public health surveillance," and that ethically conducted surveillance: "can contribute to reducing inequalities; pockets of suffering that are unfair, unjust and preventable cannot be addressed if they are not first made visible.Â
Monash also contributed to development of WHO Guidance for Managing Ethical Issues in Infectious Disease Outbreaks, published in 2016.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries