EULAR and ACR present new SLE classification criteria at 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
American College of Rheumatology News Nov 12, 2017
The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) presented the draft of new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) during a session at the 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting.
Presentations:
ÂIt is a very exciting time for systemic lupus erythematosus clinical trials, because there are new therapeutic agents being developed that will be studied over the next few years, said Dr. Johnson. ÂClassification criteria are used for the inclusion of participants in clinical trials and help us identify a more homogenous group of patients for these studies.Â
While existing classification criteria for SLE have served rheumatologists well, the new criteria supported by EULAR/ACR may have some advantages. In the past, investigative groups have favored one set of criteria over another, making it a challenge to compare study results. The ACR and EULAR agreed to collaborate to develop improved criteria that could be used by the global rheumatology community to allow for better study comparisons.
ÂIn addition, none of the existing sets of criteria have been adequate for the identification of patients with early disease, said Dr. Johnson. ÂEarly intervention in SLE may improve outcomes. This was an opportunity for the ACR to partner with EULAR to develop one set of classification criteria for SLE, with the added goal of improving classification of early SLE.
Another novel aspect of these classification criteria is that we included a patient perspective in the development process. So these new classification criteria are global, collaborative, and include that valuable patient involvement.Â
The global effort was conducted in four phases over the past four years, and included a balanced use of expert-based and data-driven methods, she said. More than 150 investigators from the ACR and EULAR were involved, as well as from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and the Euro Lupus Group. And data from more than 2,200 patients was included.
The proposed classification criteria are in near-final form, and the session at the ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting is an opportunity for rheumatologists to view the investigators progress and offer feedback, she said.
Go to Original
Presentations:
- ÂClassification Criteria in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Focus, Limitations and Unmet Needs by Martin Aringer, MD
- ÂPresentation of the New SLE Classification Criteria by Sindhu Johnson, MD, PhD
- ÂUse of the New Criteria in Real Cases by Karen H. Costenbader, MD, MPH
ÂIt is a very exciting time for systemic lupus erythematosus clinical trials, because there are new therapeutic agents being developed that will be studied over the next few years, said Dr. Johnson. ÂClassification criteria are used for the inclusion of participants in clinical trials and help us identify a more homogenous group of patients for these studies.Â
While existing classification criteria for SLE have served rheumatologists well, the new criteria supported by EULAR/ACR may have some advantages. In the past, investigative groups have favored one set of criteria over another, making it a challenge to compare study results. The ACR and EULAR agreed to collaborate to develop improved criteria that could be used by the global rheumatology community to allow for better study comparisons.
ÂIn addition, none of the existing sets of criteria have been adequate for the identification of patients with early disease, said Dr. Johnson. ÂEarly intervention in SLE may improve outcomes. This was an opportunity for the ACR to partner with EULAR to develop one set of classification criteria for SLE, with the added goal of improving classification of early SLE.
Another novel aspect of these classification criteria is that we included a patient perspective in the development process. So these new classification criteria are global, collaborative, and include that valuable patient involvement.Â
The global effort was conducted in four phases over the past four years, and included a balanced use of expert-based and data-driven methods, she said. More than 150 investigators from the ACR and EULAR were involved, as well as from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and the Euro Lupus Group. And data from more than 2,200 patients was included.
The proposed classification criteria are in near-final form, and the session at the ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting is an opportunity for rheumatologists to view the investigators progress and offer feedback, she said.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries