Closing the cardiac arrest survival gap
The University of Iowa Health News Aug 17, 2017
Over the past 15 years, however, survival of in–hospital cardiac arrest has improved considerably, particularly at hospitals participating in a nationwide evidence–based quality improvement program called Get With the GuidelinesÂResuscitation. And as overall patient survival has improved, differences in the survival rates among black and white patients have narrowed as well, according to a new study led by University of Iowa Health Care researchers.
Saket Girotra, assistant professor in the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine in the UI Department of Internal Medicine and the studyÂs senior author, says earlier studies have found that racial disparities are closely linked with hospital quality.
Using data from the AHAÂs Get With the Guidelines registry, Girotra, Joseph, and colleagues studied data from more than 112,000 patients (30,241 black and 81,898 white) at 289 hospitals who had experienced in–hospital cardiac arrest between 2000 and 2014.
After adjusting for factors such as age, gender, preexisting conditions, medical interventions before the cardiac arrest, and characteristics of the cardiac arrest itself, the researchers found that in 2000, white patients had a survival–to–discharge rate of 15.8 percent; by 2014 it had improved to 23.2 percent. Black patients in 2000 had a survival–to–discharge rate of 11.3 percent; in 2014, the rate was 21.4 percent.
ÂOver the course of the study, not only did the survival rates for both black and white patients increase, but the gap between the two groups narrowed considerably – a 4.5 percent racial gap in 2000 was lowered to 1.8 percent by 2014, Joseph says.
The research team also examined whether hospitals that disproportionately treat black patients had achieved larger improvements in survival over time; such hospitals are known to have lower survival rates. In this study, hospitals with a higher proportion of black patients in 2000 had lower rates of survival compared to the hospitals with a lower proportion of black patients. Both groups of hospitals improved over time, but the hospitals with higher proportions of black patients made much larger gains, which likely accounts for the narrowing in the gap between black and white patients by 2014.
The research team found that most improvements in survival and reductions in racial disparities over time occurred during the acute resuscitation phase, when factors such as the identification of cardiac arrest, timeliness and quality of chest compressions, and the need for defibrillation in certain cases are key.
ÂOver time, improvement in survival during the acute phase improved in both black and white patients to the point that differences between black and white patients that were present at the beginning of our study period were completely eliminated by the end of the study period, Girotra says. ÂDifferences persisted, however, between black and white patients in regard to the post–resuscitation phase. These findings provide some clues as to what may have led to the reduction in racial differences that we observed.Â
Girotra and Joseph note that the study did not examine survival rates of in–hospital cardiac arrest at hospitals not participating in the Get With the Guidelines registry. But within the context of their study, the findings should bolster ongoing quality improvement programs, such as the registry, to continue to advance their work.
ÂUnlike previous studies that have shown a reduction in racial differences in treatments or care delivery, our study showed a reduction in racial differences in an outcome measure – survival, Girotra says. ÂDemonstrating improvement in survival differences by race makes our findings even more impactful.
The study was published in the Aug. 9 issue of JAMA Cardiology journal.
Go to Original
Saket Girotra, assistant professor in the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine in the UI Department of Internal Medicine and the studyÂs senior author, says earlier studies have found that racial disparities are closely linked with hospital quality.
Using data from the AHAÂs Get With the Guidelines registry, Girotra, Joseph, and colleagues studied data from more than 112,000 patients (30,241 black and 81,898 white) at 289 hospitals who had experienced in–hospital cardiac arrest between 2000 and 2014.
After adjusting for factors such as age, gender, preexisting conditions, medical interventions before the cardiac arrest, and characteristics of the cardiac arrest itself, the researchers found that in 2000, white patients had a survival–to–discharge rate of 15.8 percent; by 2014 it had improved to 23.2 percent. Black patients in 2000 had a survival–to–discharge rate of 11.3 percent; in 2014, the rate was 21.4 percent.
ÂOver the course of the study, not only did the survival rates for both black and white patients increase, but the gap between the two groups narrowed considerably – a 4.5 percent racial gap in 2000 was lowered to 1.8 percent by 2014, Joseph says.
The research team also examined whether hospitals that disproportionately treat black patients had achieved larger improvements in survival over time; such hospitals are known to have lower survival rates. In this study, hospitals with a higher proportion of black patients in 2000 had lower rates of survival compared to the hospitals with a lower proportion of black patients. Both groups of hospitals improved over time, but the hospitals with higher proportions of black patients made much larger gains, which likely accounts for the narrowing in the gap between black and white patients by 2014.
The research team found that most improvements in survival and reductions in racial disparities over time occurred during the acute resuscitation phase, when factors such as the identification of cardiac arrest, timeliness and quality of chest compressions, and the need for defibrillation in certain cases are key.
ÂOver time, improvement in survival during the acute phase improved in both black and white patients to the point that differences between black and white patients that were present at the beginning of our study period were completely eliminated by the end of the study period, Girotra says. ÂDifferences persisted, however, between black and white patients in regard to the post–resuscitation phase. These findings provide some clues as to what may have led to the reduction in racial differences that we observed.Â
Girotra and Joseph note that the study did not examine survival rates of in–hospital cardiac arrest at hospitals not participating in the Get With the Guidelines registry. But within the context of their study, the findings should bolster ongoing quality improvement programs, such as the registry, to continue to advance their work.
ÂUnlike previous studies that have shown a reduction in racial differences in treatments or care delivery, our study showed a reduction in racial differences in an outcome measure – survival, Girotra says. ÂDemonstrating improvement in survival differences by race makes our findings even more impactful.
The study was published in the Aug. 9 issue of JAMA Cardiology journal.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries