• Profile
Close

Volatile anesthetics vs total intravenous anesthesia for cardiac surgery

New England Journal of Medicine Mar 23, 2019

Landoni G, et al. - Researchers investigated whether volatile (inhaled) anesthetic agents improved clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), owing to cardioprotective effects of these agents. They found that the reported number of deaths at 1 year among patients who received anesthesia with a volatile agent for elective CABG was not significantly fewer when compared to those who received total intravenous anesthesia for the same procedure.

Methods
  • This is a pragmatic, multicenter, single-blind, controlled trial.
  • This trial was conducted at 36 centers in 13 countries and included patients scheduled to undergo elective CABG.
  • Researchers randomly administered an intraoperative anesthetic regimen that included a volatile anesthetic (desflurane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane) or total intravenous anesthesia to the participants.
  • They assessed death from any cause at 1 year (primary outcome).

Results
  • This study included 5400 patients: 2709 received volatile anesthetics and 2691 received total intravenous anesthesia.
  • Overall 64% of patients underwent on-pump CABG, with a mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass of 79 minutes.
  • Demographic and clinical features at baseline, the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, and the number of grafts were similar between the two groups.
  • The recommendation by data and safety monitoring board at the time of the second interim analysis was that the trial should be stopped for futility.
  • In terms of deaths from any cause, both the groups demonstrated no significant difference at 1 year (2.8% in the volatile anesthetics group and 3.0% in the total intravenous anesthesia group; relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.29; P=0.71), with data available for 5353 patients (99.1%), or at 30 days (1.4% and 1.3%, respectively; relative risk, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.76), with data available for 5398 patients (99.9%).
  • Both the groups did not differ remarkably with respect to any of the secondary outcomes or in the incidence of prespecified adverse events, including myocardial infarction.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay