To compare the efficacy of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula and continuous positive airway pressure in post-extubation period in VLBW infants
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Aug 11, 2017
Garg BD, et al. – The efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was compared with heated humidified high–flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) as noninvasive respiratory support in post–extubation period in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Results revealed that in neonates ≤32 weeks of gestational age, HHHFNC displayed similar efficacy, and better safety profile than nasal–CPAP when used during post–extubation period for respiratory support.
Methods
- This study consisted of 136 neonates, ≤32 weeks gestation and ≤1500 grams birth weight, requiring noninvasive respiratory support during post–extubation period.
Results
- No significant difference was observed in post–extubation failure in HHHFNC group when compared with CPAP group (p > 0.05).
- However, post–extubation complication was significantly higher in CPAP group (p < 0.05) including nasal septal trauma and pneumothorax.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries