• Profile
Close

The submental flap for head and neck reconstruction: Comparison of outcomes to the radial forearm free flap

The Laryngoscope Dec 18, 2019

Patel UA - Researcher conducted a retrospective review on patients at two tertiary care academic hospitals by a single surgeon to contrast intraoperative, postoperative, functional, and oncologic results of the submental island pedicled flap (SIPF) to the radial forearm free flap (RFFF). Between 2004 and 2016, consecutive patients who had cancer resection and reconstruction with SIPF or RFFF have been involved. Participants in the study were 146 individuals (57 SIPF; 89 RFFF). Oral cavity, with a minority in the oropharynx, paranasal sinuses, or external eyes, was the most prevalent primary site. Compared with 48 cm2 for the RFFF, mean area of the SIPF was smaller at 28 cm2. Compared with 9 hours for RFFF, operative time for SIPF was shorter at 6.5 hours. The SIPF significantly reduces both the operating time and the hospital stay. With no contraindication to the SIPF, functional and oncological findings are identical. The SIPF is a good first-line option for reconstruction of head and neck.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay