• Profile
Close

The impact of clinical vs administrative claims coding on hospital risk-adjusted outcomes

Clinical Cardiology Aug 30, 2018

O'Brien EC, et al. - Researchers compared comorbid condition and hospital risk-adjusted outcomes prevalence based on clinical registry vs administrative claims data. They linked clinical data from hospitalized CRUSADE non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients ≥65 years to Medicare claims. Findings demonstrated that, individual comorbid condition prevalence varied significantly in registries vs claims, but hospital-level outcomes were comparable. They noted that, for myocardial infarction and for diabetes, the degree of agreement between data sources for comorbid condition prevalence was 67.8% and 89.3%, respectively. Irrespective of data source, hospital ratings were found to be similar.
Full text available Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay