The analgesic efficacy of intravenous regional anesthesia with a forearm vs conventional upper arm tourniquet: A systematic review
BMC Anesthesiology Jul 26, 2018
Dekoninck V, et al. - Analgesic efficacy of conventional, upper arm intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) was compared with that of a modified, forearm IVRA in adult patients undergoing procedures on the distal upper extremity, by analyzing the existing evidence in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Researchers found that the efficacy of forearm IVRA in providing a surgical block was equal to that of a conventional upper arm IVRA, even with a reduced, non-toxic dosage of local anesthetic. The use of a forearm IVRA did not result in severe complications and rather provided a faster onset of sensory block, better tourniquet tolerance and a dryer surgical field.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries