Ten‐year outcomes of early generation sirolimus‐ vs paclitaxel‐eluting stents in patients with left main coronary artery disease
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Aug 26, 2021
Park H, Kang DY, Kim SO, et al. - Extended follow-up of patients who had drug-eluting stents implantation revealed high overall adverse clinical event rates (with a linearly increasing event rate over time). Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) vs paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease showed no measurable differences in outcomes at 10 years.
Ten-year extended follow-up of the MAINCOMPARE registry was performed.
Participants were 778 patients with unprotected LMCA stenosis who were managed with SES (n = 607) or PES (n = 171).
A composite of death, myocardial infarction or target-vessel revascularization was the primary composite outcome.
Inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting -adjusted analyses revealed that the risks for the primary composite outcome or definite stent thrombosis did not differ significantly between SES and PES.
Stent thrombosis incidence was quite low and comparable between the groups.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries