Sutureless vs conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Dec 17, 2020
Fischlein T, Folliguet T, Meuris B, et al. - In a prospective, randomized, adaptive, open-label trial (PERSIST-AVR), it was inquired if sutureless bioprostheses are noninferior to standard bioprostheses in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Patients were randomly assigned to aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a sutureless or stented valve using conventional or minimally invasive approach. Freedom from major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events (MACCE; composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or valve reintervention) at 1 year was the primary outcome. Findings demonstrated the noninferiority of sutureless valve to stented valves in terms of MACCE at 1 year in patients receiving AVR (alone or with coronary artery bypass grafting). This indicates that consideration should be given to sutureless valves as a component of a comprehensive valve program.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries