• Profile
Close

Rivaroxaban vs warfarin sodium in the ultra-early period after atrial fibrillation–related mild ischemic stroke: A randomized clinical trial

JAMA Neurology Oct 27, 2017

Hong KS, et al. - Researchers planned this study to examine whether rivaroxaban or warfarin sodium was safer and more effective for preventing early recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)-related acute ischemic stroke. Rivaroxaban and warfarin had comparable safety and efficacy in mild AF-related acute ischemic stroke.

Methods
  • From April 28, 2014, to December 7, 2015, the researchers designed a randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded endpoint evaluation, comparative phase 2 trial.
  • They conducted this study at 14 academic medical centers in South Korea among patients with mild AF-related stroke within the previous 5 days who were deemed suitable for early anticoagulation.
  • They performed the analysis on a modified intent-to-treat basis.
  • They randomized participants 1:1 to receive rivaroxaban, 10 mg/d for 5 days followed by 15 or 20 mg/d, or warfarin with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0, for 4 weeks.
  • The composite of the new ischemic lesion or new intracranial hemorrhage seen on results of magnetic resonance imaging at 4 weeks was the primary endpoint.
  • They performed the primary analysis in patients who received at least 1 dose of study medications and completed follow-up magnetic resonance imaging.
  • Individual components of the primary endpoint and hospitalization length were included as key secondary endpoints.

Results
  • The researchers randomized 195 patients.
  • Out of them, 183 individuals (76 women and 107 men; mean [SD] age, 70.4 [10.4] years) completed magnetic resonance imaging follow-up and were included in the primary end point analysis.
  • No differences were observed in the primary end point (47 [49.5%] vs 48 [54.5%]; relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69-1.20; P = .49) or its individual components (new ischemic lesion: 28 [29.5%] vs 31 of 87 [35.6%]; relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-1.26; P = .38; new intracranial hemorrhage: 30 [31.6%] vs 25 of 87 [28.7%]; relative risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70-1.71; P = .68) in the rivaroxaban group (n = 95) and warfarin group (n = 88).
  • Each group had 1 clinical ischemic stroke.
  • All new intracranial hemorrhages were asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformations.
  • With rivaroxaban, hospitalization length was reduced compared with warfarin (median, 4.0 days [interquartile range, 2.0-6.0 days] vs 6.0 days [interquartile range, 4.0-8.0]; P < .001).
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay