Revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: Does the unicompartmental implant (metal backed vs all-polyethylene) impact the total knee arthroplasty?
Journal of Arthroplasty Mar 01, 2018
Scott CEH, et al. - The researchers herein explored the differences in implant requirement, outcomes and re-revision when total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was performed after unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty (UKAs) with metal-backed (MB) vs all-polyethylene (AP) tibial components. Increased chances of a complex revision requiring tibial stems and cruciate substitution were noted with the metal backed UKA implants. But the chances of early revision were reduced by the metal backed UKA implants compared to all-polyethylene UKA, which often failed early with pain.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries