Rapid deployment or sutureless vs conventional bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Mar 06, 2018
Sohn SH, et al. - Researchers undertook this meta-analysis comparing the early and follow-up outcomes of aortic valve replacement(AVR) using rapid deployment or sutureless (RD) valves(RDAVR group) with AVR using conventional bioprostheses(CAVR group). Compared to CAVR, RDAVR was observed to be associated with significantly shorter ACC and CPB times. However, this difference did not translate into improved postoperative outcomes, early mortality and all-cause mortality during follow-up. They suggested practicing caution when implanting RD valves as they were associated with a higher incidence of PPM insertion, regardless of the RD valve type.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries