Propensity score analysis of regorafenib versus trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy (REGOTAS): A Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum multicenter observational study
The Oncologist Sep 18, 2017
Moriwaki T, et al. - In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were refractory to standard chemotherapy, the efficacy of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) were compared. For this group of patients, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between regorafenib and TFTD was observed.
Methods
- Between June 2014 and September 2015, the clinical data of patients with mCRC who were treated with regorafenib or TFTD and those of drug-naive patients, were retrospectively collected from 24 institutions in Japan.
- Researchers used the Cox's proportional hazard models based on propensity score adjustment for baseline characteristics to assess the overall survival (OS).
Results
- The criteria was satisfied by a total of 550 patients (223 patients in the regorafenib group and 327 patients in the TFTD group).
- In the regorafenib group, the median OS was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8Â9.2), and 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.6Â8.3) in the TFTD group.
- In addition, the propensity score adjusted analysis showed that OS was similar between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78Â1.18).
- They reported a significant interaction with age, in the subgroup analysis.
- In patients aged <65 years, regorafenib showed favorable survival (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98Â1.69).
- On the other hand, TFTD was favored in patients aged ≥65 years (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.59Â1.03).
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries