Predictive and prognostic clinical and pathological factors of nivolumab efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients
Clinical and Translational Oncology Jan 27, 2018
Garde-Noguera J, et al. - In this retrospective review of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with nivolumab, the following were found to be associated with poorer prognosis: poor performance status, short period of time since the previous treatment, and more than one metastatic location.
Methods- Researchers retrospectively reviewed NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab.
- They analyzed the following variables: age, sex, stage, performance status (PS), location of metastases, presence of tumour-related symptoms and comorbidities, number of metastasis locations, previous chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic and radiotherapy treatments, and analytical data from the standard blood count and biochemistry.
- Data reported that a total of 175 patients were included, median age was 61.5 years, 73.1% were men, 77.7% were ECOG-PS 0–1, and 86.7% were included with stage IV disease.
- In 77.1%, non-squamous histology was detected.
- Nivolumab was administered to 65 in second line (37.1%).
- Brain metastasis, liver metastasis and more than one metastatic location were found in 38 patients (22%), 39 (22.3%), and 126 (72%), respectively.
- As per data, the ORR was 15.7% with median progression free survival (PFS) 2.8 months and median OS 5.81 months.
- The following were found to be associated with better response: stage III vs IV and time since the beginning of the previous line of treatment ≥ 6 vs < 6 months.
- In multivariable analysis, the following were found to be independently associated with shorter OS: PS 2, time since the previous line of treatment < 6 vs ≥ 6 months, and more than one metastatic location (7.8 vs 2.7 months, 11.2 vs 4.6 months, and 9.4 vs 5.1 month).
- Furthermore, in multivariable analysis, time since the previous treatment < 6 vs ≥ 6 months and more than one metastatic location were found to be independently related to shorter PFS (4.3 vs 2.3 months and 4.7 vs 2.3 months).
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries