Peroral endoscopic myotomy: anterior vs posterior approach: A randomized single-blinded clinical trial
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Sep 26, 2019
Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Rivory J, et al. - In this single-blinded, randomized, noninferiority international clinical trial, researchers compared the effectiveness of the anterior and posterior approaches at 1 year after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of achalasia via high-resolution esophageal manometry were eligible candidates. For this investigation, 150 patients were randomized to receive either anterior (n = 73) or posterior (n = 77) POEM. One hundred forty-eight individuals received the POEM treatment, and 138 patients completed the 1-year follow-up and were involved in the primary efficacy analysis. In 90% of patients in the anterior group and 89% of patients in the posterior group, clinical success was achieved. In terms of efficacy and safety in treating patients with achalasia, posterior myotomy during POEM was not inferior to anterior myotomy.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries