• Profile
Close

Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with reduced ejection fraction

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Oct 15, 2020

Bianco V, Kilic A, Mulukutla S, et al. - Researchers investigated patients with reduced ejection fraction in order to assess comparative results for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in this patient population. Participants were selected from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2011 to 2018. CABG and PCI cohorts having a mean ejection fraction of 35% ± 9.53% were included. Propensity matching was applied. Findings revealed significantly improved survival, lower major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and fewer repeat revascularization procedures in patients who received CABG vs those treated with PCI.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay