Patient-reported outcomes of capsular repair vs capsulotomy in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy: Minimum 5-year follow-up - A matched comparison study
Arthroscopy Jan 31, 2018
Domb BG, et al. - The authors aimed to clarify whether capsular closure during hip arthroscopy affected patient outcomes over midterm follow-up. Observations revealed a significant short-term improvement among patients undergoing hip arthroscopy and who had minimal or no arthritis, this was evident irrespective of the capsule closure. However, patients who had unrepaired capsules showed deterioration in mHHS as well as a higher rate of conversion to arthroplasty at midterm follow-up, even when controlling for various perioperative variables. Despite this, patients met the Minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) criteria in both groups. Findings suggested that in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, routine capsular closure could result in more consistently durable outcome, but also that individual patient pathology may dictate capsular management.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries