• Profile
Close

One-year evaluation of clinical and immunological efficacy and safety of sublingual vs subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy in allergic conjunctivitis

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aug 24, 2019

Sayed KM, et al. - In this prospective comparative case series study, researchers investigated 100 patients with IgE-mediated allergic conjunctivitis (AC) to determine clinical and immunological efficacy and safety of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), as well as performed comparisons between sublingual and subcutaneous routes of administration. Patients with AC commonly developed aeroallergen polysensitization. The inclusion of skin prick test in the diagnostic workup of those patients was recommended. AIT showed the potential to provide a significant decrease in symptom and medication scores without ocular or systemic side effects, and therefore, it was viewed as a safe and effective therapy for patients with AC. With regard to attaining clinical and immunologic improvement, no significant difference was found between sublingual immunotherapy vs subcutaneous immunotherapy, and therefore, the patient can pick his preferred method for therapy.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay