• Profile
Close

Non-invasive ventilation vs high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy with apnoeic oxygenation for preoxygenation before intubation of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A randomized, multicenter, open-label trial

The Lancet Respiratory Medicine Apr 02, 2019

Frat JP, et al. - In the FLORALI-2 multicenter, open-label trial, authors included 322 candidates to study the efficacy of preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation vs high-flow oxygen in lowering the risk of severe hypoxemia during intubation. They observed severe hypoxemia in 23% of patients following preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation vs 27% with high-flow oxygen. They recorded comparable serious adverse events between treatment groups. The most common immediate complications were systolic arterial hypotension (49% cases in the non-invasive ventilation group vs 50% subjects in the high-flow oxygen group) and chest infiltrates on x-ray (20% vs 19%). The most common late complications were death at day 28 (37% vs 34%) and ventilator-associated pneumonia during ICU stay in both the groups (22% vs 20%). The risk of severe hypoxemia in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure was not impacted by preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation vs high-flow oxygen therapy.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay