Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
Gynecologic Oncology Mar 07, 2020
Brandt B, Sioulas V, Basaran D, et al. - Researchers compared minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs laparotomy as a management option for newly diagnosed early-stage cervical carcinoma, focusing on oncologic and perioperative outcomes in patients. They analyzed 196 evaluable patients: 117 MIS (106 robotic [90.6%]) and 79 laparotomy cases. A median follow-up of ~4 years was performed. In the MIS group and in the laparotomy group, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were estimated to be 87.0% and 86.6%, respectively; 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 96.5% and 93.9%, respectively; and 5-year overall survival rates were identified as 96.5% and 87.4%, respectively. Overall, in this single-center and concurrent series of patients suffering from early-stage cervical carcinoma, no worse oncologic outcomes were afforded by MIS radical hysterectomy.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries