Meta-analysis of completion lymph node dissection in sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma
British Journal of Surgery Mar 30, 2019
Angeles CV, et al. - In this systematic review and meta-analysis, researchers assessed survival and recurrence rate in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma who had completion lymph node dissection (CLND) vs observation. Outcomes revealed CLND offered no significant benefit in survival or recurrence rate in patients vs observation.
Methods
- Researchers sought cohort studies and RCTs published between January 2000 and June 2017 that assessed the outcomes of CLND vs observation in patients with SLN-positive melanoma via performing a comprehensive MEDLINE and Embase database search.
- Survival was assessed as the primary outcome and recurrence rate was assessed as the secondary outcome.
- The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of RCTs and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used for cohort studies.
- For each outcome, they calculated pooled relative risk or hazard ratio with 95 % confidence intervals, and the I2 test was used to assess the extent of heterogeneity between studies.
Results
- For qualitative synthesis, researchers identified 15 studies (13 cohort studies with 7,868 patients and 2 RCTs with 2,228 patients); quantitative meta-analysis was done on 13 remaining studies.
- Patients who underwent CLND had survival comparable to those who were observed (risk ratio for death 0.85, 95 % ci 0.71 to 1.02).
- Furthermore, recurrence rate in the groups was also comparable (RR 0.91, 0.79 to 1.05).
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries