• Profile
Close

Meta-analysis comparing culprit-only vs complete multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

The American Journal of Cardiology Oct 15, 2020

Ullah W, Zahid S, Nadeem N, et al. - Given that poor prognosis in relation to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been seen in patients with concomitant multivessel coronary artery disease, therefore, researchers investigated the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit-only revascularization (COR) vs multivessel revascularization (MVR) approach. They selected relevant articles from multiple databases. This analysis involved 28 studies with 26,892 patients, 18,377 in the COR and 8,515 in the MVR group. Findings demonstrated a significant decrease in major adverse cardiovascular events, angina and need for revascularization, in relation to multivessel revascularization vs the culprit-only approach in patients with STEMI.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay