• Profile
Close

Meta-analysis comparing catheter guided ablation vs conventional medical therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

The American Journal of Cardiology Jun 12, 2018

Elgendy AY, et al. - Researchers analyzed data from randomized controlled trials reporting on the comparative prognostic benefits of catheter ablation (CA) vs conventional medical therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). A total of 775 ambulatory patients from 6 trials were assessed, with a mean follow-up of 26 months. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome, and HF hospitalizations, stroke, left ventricular EF improvement, change in 6-minute walk test and change in Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire were the secondary outcomes. Findings suggested that relative to medical therapy, CA of AF appeared to be related to improved rates of survival and HF hospitalizations. The rate of procedural complications, major and minor, was 7.3%.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay