• Profile
Close

Maintenance treatment and survival in patients with myeloma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

JAMA Oncology Aug 16, 2018

Gay F, et al. - For this investigation, researchers performed two independent searches in PubMed and Cochrane databases, and then they identified all the medical records registered after 1999 and on or before November 20, 2017 to examine and compare the efficacy of different maintenance regimens (lenalidomide-prednisone, lenalidomide alone, thalidomide-interferon, thalidomide-bortezomib, bortezomib-prednisone, thalidomide alone) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). By synthesizing the available evidence of novel agent-based maintenance in the past 20 years, and based on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), lenalidomide maintenance seems to be the best treatment choice.

Methods

  • By blinded review, researchers determined prospective phase 3 randomized trials assessing novel agent-based maintenance in subjects with NDMM; the included studies compared at least two maintenance approaches; comparators included placebo and no maintenance.
  • From 364 screened records, 11 studies were incorporated.
  • The guidelines provided by the PRISMA Report and the EQUATOR Network were followed (independent extraction).
  • Using network meta-analysis (NMA), the evidence was synthesized.
  • No maintenance was selected as common comparator and the effect of placebo was assumed to be the same as no treatment to allow comparison of all treatments.
  • The best option was recognized by a Bayesian consistency model based on hazard ratio (HR), 95% Credible Index (CrI), probability of being the best treatment (PbBT), and median ranking distribution (MedR).
  • PFS and OS were the outcomes of interest.

Results

  • According to the findings obtained, 11 trials and 8 treatments including 5,073 participants were incorporated.
  • Researchers reported that lenalidomide-based regimens (lenalidomide-prednisone, lenalidomide alone) were identified as the most effective options, by PFS analysis (HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.28-0.53] and 0.47 [95% CI, 0.39-0.55], respectively; MedR, 1 and 2; overall PbBT, 74%).
  • It was noted that four treatments (thalidomide-interferon, thalidomide-bortezomib, bortezomib-prednisone, thalidomide alone) exhibited an HR in favor of maintenance.
  • They found that lenalidomide alone was identified as the best option (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.51-1.16; MedR, 2; PbBT, 38%), followed by bortezomib-thalidomide and bortezomib-prednisone, by OS analysis.
  • Similar features were seen in the restricted network, including transplant trials, in the sensitivity analysis, and in most of the prognostic subgroups.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay