• Profile
Close

Long-term oncological outcome after conventional radical hysterectomy versus 2 nerve-sparing modalities for early stage cervical cancer

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Oct 05, 2017

van Gent MDJM, et al. - A single-center, observational prospective cohort study is conducted to research whether nerve-sparing surgery has comparable oncological outcomes as the conventional radical hysterectomy (CRH). Concurrently, they examine whether there is a difference in regards to the oncological outcomes of the 2 nerve-sparing techniques. The nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy exhibits a similar oncological outcome compared with the CRH. The more radical Swift version of nerve-sparing techniques is preferable to the former Leiden nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) procedure.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay