• Profile
Close

Long-term clinical outcomes of Amplatzer cardiac plug vs Amulet occluders for left atrial appendage closure

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Oct 29, 2019

Kleinecke C, Cheikh-Ibrahim M, Schnupp S, et al. - Researchers retrospectively analyzed three Amplatzer registries (Bern, Coburg, Zurich) to compare long-term clinical results following left atrial appendage closure with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) and Amulet. In these registries, patients were enrolled from 2009 to 2018. Overall consecutive 563 patients (344 ACP vs 219 Amulet) were analyzed and were followed-up for a mean duration of 2.9 ± 1.6 and 1.9 ± 0.9 years. A composite of major peri-procedural complications and major bleedings was assessed as a primary safety endpoint, and stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular/unexplained death were evaluated as the primary efficacy endpoint. To determine the net clinical benefit, they assessed a combination of all the above-mentioned hazards. With regard to efficacy, safety, and net clinical benefit, similar outcomes in the long term were provided by left atrial appendage closure with first and second-generation Amplatzer devices. Not the design modifications of the Amulet but implantation technique and hemodynamics were suggested as factors that may determine clinical results.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay