• Profile
Close

Is bone grafting always necessary in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with uncontained glenoid bone defects

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Dec 04, 2020

Verstuyft L, Vergison L, Van Tongel A, et al. - This study was undertaken to evaluate whether central peg positioning in the spine pillar (CPPSP) is a more feasible alternative to the use of bone grafts. Researchers enrolled a total of 60 revisions to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with uncontained glenoid bone defects. They evaluated clinical outcomes using the Constant score and assessed the complication ratio. This study’s findings demonstrate that in comparison with the use of bone grafts, individuals with uncontained glenoid bone defects undergoing a revision to an RTSP obtain similar clinical results with the CPPSP technique. The outcomes reveal that the CPPSP method is a valid alternative but has different complications.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay