• Profile
Close

Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for the induction of labor: An individual participant data meta‐analysis

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Dec 05, 2020

Kemper JI, Li W, Goni S, et al. - The selection of the studies was carried out using Cochrane Review on Mechanical Methods for Induction of Labour, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase via Ovid, Ovid Emcare, CINAHL Plus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Scopus from inception to April 2019 to compare the safety and efficacy of Foley catheter and oral misoprostol use in induction of labor (IOL). The quality of included randomized controlled trials was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the certainty of the evidence was assessed utilizing the GRADE approach. The sample consisted of 2,815 participants, of which 1,399 women were assigned to the Foley catheter and 1,416 to oral misoprostol. The Foley catheter is less effective than oral misoprostol in women undergoing IOL as it was linked to fewer vaginal births. However, although the authors found no significant variation in maternal safety, Foley catheter induction may lessen adverse perinatal outcomes.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay