End-tidal control vs. manually controlled minimal-flow anesthesia: A prospective comparative trial
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Aug 25, 2017
Wetz AJ, et al. – This study entailed testing of the validity of a presumption that end–tidal control is superior to manually controlled minimal–flow anesthesia (0.5 l/min). Findings demonstrated that in comparison to manual control, end–tidal control displayed superiority in terms of setting and maintaining oxygen and anesthetic gas concentrations in a stable and rapid manner. Consequently, end–tidal control could effectively support the anesthetist.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries