Efficiency and tolerability of induction and consolidation therapy with arsenic trioxide/bortezomib/ascorbic acid/dexamethasone (ABCD) regimen compared with bortezomib/dexamethasone (BD) regimen in newly diagnosed myeloma patients
Cancer Management and Research Jan 23, 2020
Qian W, Wang L, Li P, et al. - Researchers compared an arsenic trioxide/bortezomib/ascorbic acid/dexamethasone (ABCD) regimen vs a bortezomib/dexamethasone (BD) regimen, in terms of efficacy and tolerability among patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. They treated 57 patients with the ABCD regimen and 64 patients with the BD regimen. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation followed by consolidation was received by eligible and agreeable patients. In the ABCD- and BD-treated groups, the response rates (above VGPR) were estimated to be 74.1% and 32.8%, respectively. A significant improvement in PFS and OS was achieved with ABCD regimen vs BD regimen among newly diagnosed patients. A benefit was particularly suggested for patients exhibiting a high tumor burden, low or standard risk, and without auto-HSCT vs the same group with BD regimen. A good prognostic factor for ABCD-related OS and PFS was a complete response or near CR following induction therapy. Findings revealed the effectiveness as well as the tolerability of ABCD vs BD regimen in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Among low- and standard-risk patients, the ABCD regimen could afford an economical, effective, and tolerable option.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries