Effect of high-flow oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy on invasive mechanical ventilation and clinical recovery in patients with severe COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial
JAMA Dec 10, 2021
Ospina-Tascón GA, Calderón-Tapia LE, García AF, et al. - Researchers investigated the necessity for intubation and time to clinical improvement among patients with severe COVID-19 in correlation with the use of high-flow oxygen therapy through a nasal cannula, vs conventional oxygen therapy.
A randomized clinical trial including 220 patients with severe COVID-19.
Those treated with high-flow oxygen therapy through a nasal cannula vs with conventional oxygen therapy had intubation and mechanical ventilation rate of 34.3% vs 51.0%, respectively.
The median time to clinical recovery was 11 days vs 14 days.
Findings suggest reduced likelihood of invasive mechanical ventilation and decreased time to clinical recovery among patients with severe COVID-19 in correlation with receiving treatment with high-flow oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries