• Profile
Close

Effect of cricoid pressure compared with a sham procedure in the rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: The IRIS randomized clinical trial

JAMA Jan 22, 2019

Birenbaum A, et al. - Researchers investigated whether cricoid pressure (Sellick maneuver) prevent pulmonary aspiration in patients undergoing rapid sequence induction of anesthesia. In this randomized, noninferiority double-blind trial involving 3472 patients, patients were assigned to a cricoid pressure (Sellick group) or a sham procedure group. Findings failed to demonstrate the noninferiority of the sham procedure in preventing pulmonary aspiration.

Methods
  • Researchers conducted a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial in 10 academic centers.
  • From February 2014 until February 2017, they enrolled patients undergoing anesthesia with rapid sequence induction (RSI); follow up was performed for 28 days or until hospital discharge (last follow-up, February 8, 2017).
  • The incidence of pulmonary aspiration (at the glottis level during laryngoscopy or by tracheal aspiration after intubation) was the primary end point.
  • They presumed that compared to cricoid pressure, the sham procedure would not be inferior.
  • In this study, the secondary end points were related to pulmonary aspiration, difficult tracheal intubation, and traumatic complications owing to the tracheal intubation or cricoid pressure.

Results
  • Researchers randomized 3472 patients, mean (SD) age was 51 (19) years and 1777 (51%) were men.
  • In 10 patients (0.6%) in the Sellick group and 9 patients (0.5%) in the sham group, pulmonary aspiration occurred.
  • The 1-sided 95% CI of relative risk had the upper limit of 2.00, exceeding 1.50, failing to demonstrate noninferiority (P=.14).
  • The risk difference in the intent-to- treat population was −0.06% (2-sided 95% CI, −0.57 to 0.42) and in the per protocol population was −0.06% (2-sided 95% CI, −0.56 to 0.43).
  • The groups were not significantly different in terms of secondary end points (pneumonia, length of stay, and mortality), although the comparison of the Cormack and Lehane grade (Grades 3 and 4, 10% vs 5%; P <.001) and the longer intubation time (Intubation time >30 seconds, 47% vs 40%; P <.001) suggest an increased difficulty of tracheal intubation in the Sellick group.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay