• Profile
Close

Does continuous EEG influence prognosis in patients after cardiac arrest?

Resuscitation Aug 30, 2018

Fatuzzo D, et al. - In comatose cardiac arrest (CA) patients, the impact of continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) (>18 hours) vs routine intermittent EEG (rEEG)(<30 minutes) on the outcome as part of multimodal prognostication was assessed. They performed an analysis of a large prospective registry of comatose post-CA adults (n=497; 2009-2018), stratified based on whether they received cEEG (n=62) or rEEG (n=435), including standardized reactivity testing at two time-points. Findings suggest that cEEG had no advantage over intermittent rEEG regarding outcome in patients with CA, and no influence on the time to death.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay