Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Sep 28, 2017
Marghalani A, et al. - The authors compared the accuracy of digital implant impressions using 2 different intraoral scanners (IOSs) with that of conventional impressions for partially edentulous arches. They concluded that both the impression technique and the implant system affected accuracy, within the limitations of this study. Compared with the other 2 techniques, the True Definition technique had the fewest 3D deviations. However, the accuracy of all impression techniques was within clinically acceptable levels, and not all differences were statistically significant.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries