• Profile
Close

Diagnostic value of FDG-PET vs magnetic resonance imaging for detecting spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Spine Journal Aug 22, 2018

Yin Y, et al. - The researchers carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic values of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting spondylitis via systematically search of online PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through September 2017 for studies comparing the diagnostic values of 18F-FDG-PET and MRI. As compared to MRI, the summary results of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) were higher in 18F-FDG-PET. It was noted that negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was lower in 18F-FDG-PET than in MRI. In detecting spondylitis, 18F-FDG-PET had higher diagnostic value compared with MRI.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay