• Profile
Close

Continuous vs 1-year fixed-duration nivolumab in previously treated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 153

Journal of Clinical Oncology Nov 21, 2020

Waterhouse DM, Garon EB, Chandler J, et al. - Researchers compared the effect of 1-year fixed-duration vs continuous therapy on the effectiveness as well as safety of nivolumab in an exploratory analysis of a largely community-based phase IIIb/IV study, CheckMate 153. Nivolumab monotherapy (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) was administered to patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. A total of 1,428 patients were treated, and of those, 252 were randomized to continuous (n = 127) or 1-year fixed-duration (n = 125) treatment (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). A minimum post–random assignment follow-up of 13.5 months revealed that continuous therapy afforded longer median progression-free survival than 1-year fixed-duration treatment. These data are the first randomized data on continuous vs fixed-duration immunotherapy in previously treated advanced NSCLC. These results indicate that improved outcomes are achieved by continuing nivolumab beyond 1 year.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay