Comparison of positive predictive values of categorization of suspicious calcifications using the 4th and 5th editions of BI-RADS
American Journal of Roentgenology Aug 29, 2019
Park GE, et al. - A total of 469 cases from 444 women with pathologically confirmed suspicious calcifications from January 2012 to June 2016 were recruited in a retrospective study by the researchers in order to assess variations in the positive predictive value (PPV) of categorization of suspicious calcification for malignancy with the 4th vs the 5th edition of BI-RADS. The PPVs of categorization using the 5th edition matched better with BI-RADS category evaluation in comparison with categorization using the 4th edition. The PPVs of morphology were amorphous, 15.9%; coarse heterogeneous, 31.7%; fine pleomorphic, 58.2%; and fine linear or branching, 90.6%. The PPVs of distribution were regional, 31.5%; grouped, 31.3%; linear, 50%; and segmental, 77.9%. Distribution influenced the PPVs and categorization of coarse heterogeneous, fine pleomorphic, and fine linear or branching calcifications when distribution was classified into two types (grouped or regional vs segmental or linear) and investigated in combination with suspicious morphology. Thus, to stratify risk levels of areas of suspicious calcification, categorization using both morphology and distribution according to the BI-RADS 5th edition was beneficial.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries