Comparison of carotid endarterectomy and stenting for symptomatic internal carotid artery near-occlusion
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 14, 2019
Kim J, et al. - Through a retrospective database review conducted from January 2010 to December 2018 on 45 subjects who underwent carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting for symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) near-occlusion (severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery with partial or full collapse of the distal vessel wall) and had 1-month clinical and imaging follow-up with carotid sonography, the experts assessed the safety of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in ICA-near-occlusion. out of 45, 39 were recruited in the study. Twenty-five underwent carotid endarterectomy and 14 underwent carotid artery stenting. Every patient had technically victorious immediate revascularization of the ICA. Subjects with carotid artery stenting had 20% and 79% restenosis and vessel maturation rates, respectively, whereas individuals with carotid endarterectomy had 17.4% and 84% restenosis and vessel maturation, respectively. No meaningful variation in periprocedural complication rates among the 2 procedures was observed. Hence, in comparison with carotid endarterectomy for ICA near-occlusion, similar results were exhibited by carotid artery stenting in restenosis and vessel maturation rates. However, no major variation among the 2 treatments in clinical outcomes or periprocedural complications were seen. Moreover, for carotid near-occlusion, carotid artery stenting was a revascularization option if the subject was regarded at high risk for carotid endarterectomy.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries