Comparison of acute vs subacute coronary angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (from the NONSTEMI trial)
The American Journal of Cardiology Jul 24, 2019
Rasmussen MB, et al. - In order to define the optimal timing of coronary angiography (CAG) in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome without persisting ST-segment elevation (NST-ACS), researchers examined 496 patients with suspected NST-ACS in the NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction trial to compare outcomes between those randomized to acute CAG (STEMI-like approach, <2 hours, n = 245) and those randomized to medical therapy and subacute CAG (<72 hours, n = 251). A composite of all-cause mortality, reinfarction, and readmission with congestive heart failure within 1 year from randomization was assessed as the primary end point. Findings revealed no difference with regard to the composite end point of all-cause death, reinfarction, and readmission with congestive heart failure as well as mortality between an acute and subacute CAG approach in NSTE-ACS patients. However, safety, as well as the feasibility of a strategy involving the detection of NSTE-ACS patients in the prehospital phase and direct triage to an invasive center, was suggested. In addition, this strategy could facilitate early diagnosis and revascularization.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries