• Profile
Close

Comparing outcomes of general anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation experience

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Feb 03, 2021

Sammour Y, Kerrigan J, Banerjee K, et al. - Researchers compared results with general anesthesia (GA) vs monitored anesthesia care (MAC) among consecutive patients who had transfemoral‐transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) at their institution between January 2012 and April 2017. Shorter procedural time, fluoroscopy time, lower contrast volume, and reduced radiation exposure were noted in relation to MAC. A briefer median intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay, and more frequent discharge to home was evident in patients who received MAC. Lower mortality at 30 days, but not at 1 year or 3 years, was experienced by MAC recipients. Based on these findings, it appeared that a strategy involving MAC use and omission of intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography during TAVR conferred more efficiency and did not compromise safety. Better TAVR results can be obtained with newer generation valves without requiring GA.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay