Comparative study of the difference of perioperative complication and radiologic results: MIS-DLIF (minimally invasive direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion) vs MIS-OLIF (minimally invasive oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion)
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques Feb 09, 2018
Jin J, et al. - In cases of single-level surgery at L4–L5, the incidence of perioperative complication, the difference of cage location, and sagittal alignment were comparatively analyzed by the authors between minimally invasive oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-OLIF) and MIS-direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion (DLIF). By eliminating the risk of unwanted muscle and nerve manipulations, the OLIF technique approach-related perioperative morbidities could be decreased, as revealed by this report of L4/L5 level diseases. Findings disclosed that the cage could be safely placed more posteriorly through the orthogonal maneuver. This approach would lead to better disk and foraminal height restoration.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries