• Profile
Close

Comparative efficacy of treatments for Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

The Lancet Infectious Diseases Aug 28, 2018

Beinortas T, et al. - In this random effects network meta-analysis, researchers compared and ranked treatments for non-multiply recurrent infections with Clostridium difficile in adults. By the highest quality evidence, most frequent symptomatic cure was offered by fidaxomicin. Furthermore, fidaxomicin demonstrated better therapeutic efficacy than vancomycin in all patients except for those with severe infections with C difficile and could be considered as a first-line therapy. Findings suggested not to go for metronidazole to treat C difficile.

Methods

  • This meta-analysis was performed within a frequentist setting to obtain direct and indirect comparisons of trials.
  • From the inception until June 30, 2017, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for published and unpublished trials.
  • Researchers included randomised controlled trials of treatments for non-multiply recurrent infections with confirmed C difficile in adults (at least 18 years) that reported both primary cure and recurrence rates.
  • Using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, they appraised trial methods.
  • They extracted the total numbers of patients with primary cure and recurrence.
  • They sought for sustained symptomatic cure, defined as the number of patients with resolution of diarrhoea minus the number with recurrence or death.

Results

  • The analysis included 24 trials, comprising 5,361 patients and 13 different treatments, of 23,004 studies screened.
  • The overall quality of evidence was rated as moderate to low.
  • Fidaxomicin (odds ratio 0·67, 95% CI 0·55–0·82) and teicoplanin (0·37, 0·14–0·94) were significantly better than vancomycin in terms of providing sustained symptomatic cure.
  • Compared with metronidazole, teicoplanin (0·27, 0·10–0·70), ridinilazole (0·41, 0·19–0·88), fidaxomicin (0·49, 0·35–0·68), surotomycin (0·66, 0·45–0·97), and vancomycin (0·73, 0·56–0·95) were found to be better.
  • According to findings, bacitracin was found inferior to teicoplanin (0·22, 0·06–0·77) and fidaxomicin (0·40, 0·17–0·94), and tolevamer was found to be inferior to all drugs except for LFF571 (0·50, 0·18–1·39) and bacitracin (0·67, 0·28–1·58).
  • A low global heterogeneity of the entire network was reported (Cochran's Q=15·70; p=0·47).

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay