Comparative efficacy of clonidine versus magnesium sulfate as an adjunct to lignocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia for postoperative analgesia: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology Sep 14, 2017
Kaur P, et al. - This study compared the effectiveness as well as of side effect profile of clonidine with that of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) when used as an adjunct to lignocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) for postoperative analgesia. As an adjunct to lignocaine in IVRA, MgSO4 versus clonidine provided better postoperative analgesia with fewer side effects.
Methods
- This prospective double-blind randomized controlled study was conducted in a tertiary care institute and included forty adult patients.
- Researchers assigned patients into 2 groups; Group 1 (n = 20) received 3 mg/kg of 2% lignocaine + 50% MgSO4 1.5 g diluted with normal saline to 40 ml, while Group 2 (n = 20) received 3 mg/kg of 2% lignocaine + clonidine 150 μg diluted with normal saline to 40 ml.
- They compared pain score, time to first rescue analgesic (TTFA), total number of rescue analgesics required, and the side effects of the two drugs for 24 h postoperatively.
Results
- Findings demonstrated that the mean TTFA was significantly longer in Group 1 (193.9 ± 38.4 min) than in Group 2 (169.5 ± 33.3 min); P <0.05.
- Researchers found that the mean number of rescue analgesics required was 1.6 ± 0.7 in Group 1 as compared to 2.1 ± 0.8 in Group 2 (P < 0.05).
- They also noted more serious side effects such as hypotension and bradycardia with clonidine, although all patients experienced transient pain during intravenous injection of MgSO4.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries