Comparative effectiveness and safety of LABA-LAMA vs LABA-ICS treatment of COPD in real world clinical practice
Chest Mar 29, 2019
Suissa S, et al. - In a real world clinical practice setting of COPD treatment, researchers compared the efficacy as well as the safety of two treatment regimens: combined long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) [LABA-LAMA] vs the combination of LABA with inhaled corticosteroids (LABA-ICS). From the United Kingdom’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a cohort of COPD patients (age 55 or older) was identified during 2002-2015. Using time-conditional high-dimensional propensity scores, they matched patients initiating LABA-LAMA on the same day (no ICS) to patients initiating LABA-ICS on the same day (no LAMA). For a one-year, participants were followed-up to determine the occurrence of moderate or severe COPD exacerbation and severe pneumonia. Based on the findings, COPD exacerbations could be prevented with combined LABA-LAMA inhalers as effectively as with combined LABA-ICS inhalers. Since fewer severe pneumonias were reported with a LABA-LAMA combination, therefore, it could be preferred.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries