Artificial ventilation during transport: A randomized crossover study of manual resuscitators with comparison to mechanical ventilators in a simulation model
Paediatric Anaesthesia Sep 07, 2018
Lucy MJ, et al. - Authors evaluated the performance of the self-inflating resuscitator and the flow-inflating resuscitator, both equipped with inline manometry, and several mechanical ventilators to deliver prescribed ventilation parameters during simulated pediatric transport. Findings suggested that regardless of provider experience or device type, a majority of breaths delivered by manual resuscitation device fall outside of target range. The other positive-pressure ventilation methods were outperformed by the mechanical ventilator (Hamilton-T1) with respect to delivery of important ventilation parameters. Conversely, 100% of breaths delivered by the LTV 1200 were considered unacceptable.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries