• Profile
Close

A randomized, split‐face, double‐blind, comparative study of the safety and efficacy of small‐ and large‐particle hyaluronic acid fillers for the treatment of nasolabial folds

Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Oct 02, 2020

Nikolis A, Enright KM, Öhrlund Å, et al. - Since hyaluronic acid (HA) injections for tissue augmentation are one of the most common aesthetic treatments performed worldwide, however, few studies have compared the safety and effectiveness of small‐ and large‐particle HA (SP‐HA; LP‐HA), researchers used prospective, split‐face, triple‐blind study design to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of SP‐HA and LP‐HA for the correction of nasolabial folds (NLFs). The sample consisted of 10 female participants. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed by the investigator and reported in diaries by the participants. According to findings, LP‐HA shows better effectiveness for correcting bony resorption in the nasal pyriform region. Throughout the trial, there were no serious AEs or AEs linked to the investigational device.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay