A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing intracoronary vs intravenous abciximab in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing transradial rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed thrombolysis
The American Journal of Cardiology Apr 02, 2018
Bertrand OF, et al. - In order to gain clarity regarding the risk/benefit ratio of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors with dual oral antiplatelet therapy after failed thrombolysis and rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), researchers compared intravenous (IV) and intracoronary (IC) abciximab delivery in patients referred for rescue transradial PCI. They looked for primary angiographic endpoints (final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow and myocardial blush grades) and secondary endpoints (acute and 6-month outcomes using angiographic parameters, platelet aggregation parameters, cardiac biomarkers, cardiac magnetic resonance measurements [CMR]) and clinical endpoints. Overall, no significant clinical impact of IC or IV abciximab was seen, compared with placebo, in STEMI patients presenting with failed thrombolysis undergoing transradial rescue PCI.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries